State v. Todd

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Todd

243 S.W.3d 537, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 115, 2008 WL 170381

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 22, 2008·No. No. ED 89429·Published

Opinion

[538] ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jimmy L. Todd appeals the judgment entered upon his convictions by a jury for possession of a controlled substance, Section 195.202 RSMo 2000; six counts of possession of a chemical with intent to produce a controlled substance, Section 195.420 RSMo 2000; and possession of drug paraphernalia with intent to produce, Section 195.233 RSMo 2000. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[538] ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jimmy L. Todd appeals the judgment entered upon his convictions by a jury for possession of a controlled substance, Section 195.202 RSMo 2000; six counts of possession of a chemical with intent to produce a controlled substance, Section 195.420 RSMo 2000; and possession of drug paraphernalia with intent to produce, Section 195.233 RSMo 2000. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Todd, 243 S.W.3d 537, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 115, 2008 WL 170381 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

243 S.W.3d 537 (State v. Todd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.