State v. Todd

872 S.W.2d 175, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 463, 1994 WL 88055
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Todd. Read the opinion of the Court — 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1793
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 22, 1994·No. Nos. 62526, 63983·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury of robbery in the first degree, § 569.020, RSMo 1986, and the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evi-dentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Todd, 872 S.W.2d 175, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 463, 1994 WL 88055 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

872 S.W.2d 175 (State v. Todd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.