State v. Toadvine

3 S.C.L. 16
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided December 15, 1796·Published

Opinion

Indictment for counterfeiting, concluding “ contrary to the statute.”

Motion in arrest of judgment, that such conclusion was ill, and riot equivalent to “ contrary to the farm of the statute.'”

The exception was" not allowed;

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Toadvine, 3 S.C.L. 16 (S.C. 1796).

3 S.C.L. 16 (State v. Toadvine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.