State v. Toadvine

3 S.C.L. 16
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedDecember 15, 1796
StatusPublished

This text of 3 S.C.L. 16 (State v. Toadvine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Toadvine, 3 S.C.L. 16 (S.C. 1796).

Opinion

Indictment for counterfeiting, concluding “ contrary to the statute.”

Motion in arrest of judgment, that such conclusion was ill, and riot equivalent to “ contrary to the farm of the statute.'”

The exception was" not allowed;

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 S.C.L. 16, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-toadvine-sc-1796.