State v. Titsworth

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Titsworth

356 S.W.3d 876, 2012 WL 122817, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 29

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 17, 2012

DocketED 95822

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 356 S.W.3d 876 (State v. Titsworth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Titsworth, 356 S.W.3d 876, 2012 WL 122817, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 29 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Deron Titsworth appeals the judgment entered upon a jury’s verdict convicting him of second-degree domestic assault. We find that there was sufficient evidence to support his conviction for second-degree domestic assault.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Deron Titsworth appeals the judgment entered upon a jury’s verdict convicting him of second-degree domestic assault. We find that there was sufficient evidence to support his conviction for second-degree domestic assault.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

356 S.W.3d 876, 2012 WL 122817, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 29, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-titsworth-moctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack