State v. Titsworth

356 S.W.3d 876, 2012 WL 122817, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 29
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 17, 2012·No. ED 95822·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Deron Titsworth appeals the judgment entered upon a jury’s verdict convicting him of second-degree domestic assault. We find that there was sufficient evidence to support his conviction for second-degree domestic assault.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Titsworth, 356 S.W.3d 876, 2012 WL 122817, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 29 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

356 S.W.3d 876 (State v. Titsworth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Edmond
356 S.W.3d 876 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)