State v. Tipler

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Tipler

573 S.W.3d 762

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 30, 2019

DocketNo. ED 106235

StatusPublished

This text of 573 S.W.3d 762 (State v. Tipler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Tipler, 573 S.W.3d 762 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Kendrick Lamarr Tipler appeals from the judgment of the trial court convicting him of one count of first-degree child molestation following a jury trial. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 84.16(b) (2018).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Kendrick Lamarr Tipler appeals from the judgment of the trial court convicting him of one count of first-degree child molestation following a jury trial. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 84.16(b) (2018).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

573 S.W.3d 762, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-tipler-moctapp-2019.