State v. Tindal

Montana Supreme Court

State v. Tindal

230 Mont. 25

CourtMontana Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 12, 1987

DocketNo. DC-84-144

StatusPublished

This text of 230 Mont. 25 (State v. Tindal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Tindal, 230 Mont. 25 (Mo. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

DECISION

[26]*26DATED this 12th day of November, 1987.

The application of the above-named defendant for a review of the sentence of 30 years for Mitigated Deliberate Homicide plus 5 years for the use of a weapon; to be served consecutively, DANGEROUS OFFENDER STATUS, imposed on March 12, 1985, was fully heard and after a careful consideration of the entire matter it is decided that: the sentence shall remain the same as originally imposed, however, the DANGEROUS DESIGNATION shall be removed.

This Board finds nothing in the record that would determine this Petitioner a Dangerous Offender.

We wish to thank Amy Guth of the Montana Defender Project for her assistance to the Defendant and to this Court.

SENTENCE REVIEW DIVISION Frank M. Davis, Chairman, Thomas C. Honzel, Douglas Harkin, Judges.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DECISION

[26]*26DATED this 12th day of November, 1987.

The application of the above-named defendant for a review of the sentence of 30 years for Mitigated Deliberate Homicide plus 5 years for the use of a weapon; to be served consecutively, DANGEROUS OFFENDER STATUS, imposed on March 12, 1985, was fully heard and after a careful consideration of the entire matter it is decided that: the sentence shall remain the same as originally imposed, however, the DANGEROUS DESIGNATION shall be removed.

This Board finds nothing in the record that would determine this Petitioner a Dangerous Offender.

We wish to thank Amy Guth of the Montana Defender Project for her assistance to the Defendant and to this Court.

SENTENCE REVIEW DIVISION Frank M. Davis, Chairman, Thomas C. Honzel, Douglas Harkin, Judges.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

230 Mont. 25, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-tindal-mont-1987.