State v. Tickerhoof

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Tickerhoof

131 P.3d 820, 204 Or. App. 679, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 310

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedMarch 15, 2006

DocketMC000057B; A128099

StatusPublished

This text of 131 P.3d 820 (State v. Tickerhoof) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Tickerhoof, 131 P.3d 820, 204 Or. App. 679, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 310 (Or. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

In this appeal of a judgment of involuntary mental commitment, appellant contends that the trial court erred in finding that she is mentally ill and is not willing or able to participate in treatment on a voluntary basis. ORS 426.005; ORS 426.130. The state concedes that the record does not provide clear and convincing evidence to support the involuntary commitment. On de novo review, we agree and accept the state’s concession.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

In this appeal of a judgment of involuntary mental commitment, appellant contends that the trial court erred in finding that she is mentally ill and is not willing or able to participate in treatment on a voluntary basis. ORS 426.005; ORS 426.130. The state concedes that the record does not provide clear and convincing evidence to support the involuntary commitment. On de novo review, we agree and accept the state’s concession.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

131 P.3d 820, 204 Or. App. 679, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-tickerhoof-orctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack