State v. Thurston

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Thurston

817 S.W.2d 569, 1991 WL 158546

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 20, 1991·No. No. 59142·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was convicted by a jury of armed robbery in the first degree, armed criminal action, and assault in the second degree. He appeals; we affirm. The judgments are based upon findings of facts that are not clearly erroneous and no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was convicted by a jury of armed robbery in the first degree, armed criminal action, and assault in the second degree. He appeals; we affirm. The judgments are based upon findings of facts that are not clearly erroneous and no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Thurston, 817 S.W.2d 569, 1991 WL 158546 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

817 S.W.2d 569 (State v. Thurston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.