State v. Thurman

298 S.W.3d 589, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1731, 2009 WL 4639660
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 8, 2009·No. ED 92661·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Brian R. Thurman (Defendant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment in a court-tried case where he was convicted of one count of the unclassified felony of attempted enticement of a child, Section 566.151, RSMo Cum.Supp.2007, 1 for which Defendant was sentenced to five years’ imprisonment. Defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain his conviction. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

. Unless otherwise indicated, all further statutory references are to RSMo Cum.Supp.2007.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Thurman, 298 S.W.3d 589, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1731, 2009 WL 4639660 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

298 S.W.3d 589 (State v. Thurman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

LOPEZ-SANTIZ v. State
298 S.W.3d 589 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)