State v. Throckmorton

2010 Ohio 2693, 126 Ohio St. 3d 55

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed to the extent that the court of appeals held that the trial court could impose court costs in the sentencing entry when the defendant had not been informed at the sentencing hearing that those costs would be imposed as part of his sentence on the authority of State v. Joseph, 125 Ohio St.3d 76, 2010-Ohio-954, 926 N.E.2d 278, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with State v. Joseph.

Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Brown, C.J., not participating.