State v. Threatt

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Threatt

822 N.E.2d 371, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1415

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Threatt. Read the opinion of the Court — 108 Ohio St. 3d 277 →

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 4, 2005·No. 2004-1279·Published

Opinion

Stark App. No. 2003CA00368, 2004-Ohio-3261. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Stark County.

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the stay of briefing is dissolved, and this cause is no longer held for the decisions in 2003-1048 and 2003-1049, State v. White, Guernsey App. No. 02CA23, 2003-Ohio-2289.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the Clerk shall issue an order for the transmittal of the record from the Court of Appeals for Stark County and that briefing shall proceed in accordance with S.Ct.Prac.R. VI.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this case remains consolidated with 2004-1696, State v. Threatt, Stark App. No. 2003CA00368, 2004-Ohio-3261, and that the parties shall combine the briefing of 2004-1279 and 2004-1696 and file one brief for each permitted under S.Ct.Prac.R. VI; the parties shall file an original of the brief in each case and 18 copies of the brief; and the parties shall otherwise comply with the requirements of S.Ct.Prac.R. VI.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stark App. No. 2003CA00368, 2004-Ohio-3261. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Stark County.

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the stay of briefing is dissolved, and this cause is no longer held for the decisions in 2003-1048 and 2003-1049, State v. White, Guernsey App. No. 02CA23, 2003-Ohio-2289.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the Clerk shall issue an order for the transmittal of the record from the Court of Appeals for Stark County and that briefing shall proceed in accordance with S.Ct.Prac.R. VI.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this case remains consolidated with 2004-1696, State v. Threatt, Stark App. No. 2003CA00368, 2004-Ohio-3261, and that the parties shall combine the briefing of 2004-1279 and 2004-1696 and file one brief for each permitted under S.Ct.Prac.R. VI; the parties shall file an original of the brief in each case and 18 copies of the brief; and the parties shall otherwise comply with the requirements of S.Ct.Prac.R. VI.

State v. Threatt, 822 N.E.2d 371, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1415 (Ohio 2005).

Pincite

822 N.E.2d 371 (State v. Threatt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related