State v. Thornton

196 Or. App. 636, 2004 Ore. App. LEXIS 1643
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedDecember 15, 2004
Docket02113259C; A121583
StatusPublished

This text of 196 Or. App. 636 (State v. Thornton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Thornton, 196 Or. App. 636, 2004 Ore. App. LEXIS 1643 (Or. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Conviction affirmed; sentence vacated; remanded for resentencing. State v. Gornick, 196 Or App 397, 102 P3d 734 (2004); State v. Ross, 196 Or App 420, 102 P3d 755 (2004).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Ross
102 P.3d 755 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2004)
State v. Gornick
102 P.3d 734 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
196 Or. App. 636, 2004 Ore. App. LEXIS 1643, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-thornton-orctapp-2004.