State v. Thomure

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Thomure

374 S.W.3d 399, 2012 WL 3662353, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1020

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 28, 2012·No. No. ED 96565·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

ORDER

John R. Thomure appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of third-degree assault of a law enforcement officer and resisting arrest. We find that the trial court did not plainly err in accepting the jury’s verdict as to resisting arrest.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

ORDER

John R. Thomure appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of third-degree assault of a law enforcement officer and resisting arrest. We find that the trial court did not plainly err in accepting the jury’s verdict as to resisting arrest.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Thomure, 374 S.W.3d 399, 2012 WL 3662353, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1020 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

374 S.W.3d 399 (State v. Thomure) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.