State v. Thomson

2026 Ohio 902

• Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
• Decided: March 18, 2026
• Docket: 31858
• Status: Published

Opinion

[Cite as State v. Thomson, 2026-Ohio-902.]

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT )

STATE OF OHIO SUMMIT COMMON C.A. No. 31858 PLEAS

Respondent

v.

JASEN THOMSON ORIGINAL ACTION IN HABEAS CORPUS Petitioner

Dated: March 18, 2026

PER CURIAM.

{¶1} Petitioner, Jasen Thomson, has filed a document captioned “Petition Habaus (sic.)

Corpus Expidited (sic.) Election Case.” The petition alleges that Mr. Thomson is being held

unlawfully by the Summit County Sheriff’s Department. Because Mr. Thomson failed to comply

with the mandatory requirements of R.C. 2969.25, this Court must dismiss this case.

{¶2} R.C. 2969.25 sets forth specific filing requirements for inmates who file a civil

action against a government employee. The Summit County Sheriff’s Department is a government

entity, and Mr. Thomson, incarcerated in the Summit County Jail, is an inmate. R.C. 2969.21(C)

and (D). A case must be dismissed if an inmate fails to comply with the mandatory requirements

of R.C. 2969.25 in the commencement of the action. State ex rel. Graham v. Findlay Mun. Court,

2005-Ohio-3671, ¶ 6. 2

{¶3} Mr. Thomson was required to file filed an affidavit of prior civil actions at the

commencement of this action. R.C. 2969.25(A). Mr. Thomson, however, only filed the petition.

Because he failed to file an affidavit of prior civil actions, this case must be

dismissed. “Compliance with R.C. 2969.25(A) is mandatory, and a failure to comply warrants

dismissal of the action.” State ex rel. Woods v. Jenkins, 2023-Ohio-2333, ¶ 4, quoting State v.

Henton, 2016-Ohio-1518, ¶ 3.

{¶4} Mr. Thomson was also required to pay the cost deposit, as required by this Court’s

Local Rules, or comply with R.C. 2969.25(C). Mr. Thomson did not pay the cost deposit when he

filed the petition. He did move to waive prepayment of the cost deposit. That motion, however,

failed to comply with the requirement that Mr. Thomson file a statement of his prisoner trust

account showing the balance for each of the six months preceding the filing of his action.

{¶5} Mr. Thomson filed an affidavit of indigency stating that he is without the funds to

pay the costs of the action. R.C. 2969.25(C) requires an inmate who seeks a waiver of the

prepayment of the cost deposit, as Mr. Thomson did, to file specific, statutorily required,

information. The Supreme Court has held that failure to pay the cost deposit or seek a waiver

supported by the statutorily mandated documents requires dismissal of the case. Dunkle v. Hill,

2021-Ohio-3835, ¶ 7.

{¶6} Because Mr. Thomson failed to comply with the mandatory requirements of R.C.

2969.25(A) and (C), this case is dismissed. Costs taxed to Mr. Thomson. 3

{¶7} The clerk of courts is hereby directed to serve upon all parties not in default notice

of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal. See Civ.R. 58(B).

JILL FLAGG LANZINGER FOR THE COURT

SUTTON, J. STEVENSON, J. CONCUR.

APPEARANCES:

JASEN E. THOMSON, Pro Se, Petitioner.