State v. Thompson

Utah Supreme Court

State v. Thompson

50 P. 409, 15 Utah 488, 1897 Utah LEXIS 70

CourtUtah Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 29, 1897

DocketNo. 839

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 50 P. 409 (State v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Thompson, 50 P. 409, 15 Utah 488, 1897 Utah LEXIS 70 (Utah 1897).

Pincite

Opinion

MiNER, J.:

The appellant, Thompson, was indicted for the crime of larceny in May, 1895. He was tried in Emery county in May, 1897, before a jury consisting of eight persons duly chosen and qualified; found guilty; and sentenced to imprisonment in the penitentiary. When called upon for sentence, his counsel moved to vacate and set aside the verdict, on the ground that the defendant had been tried before eight jurors, when the law in force at the time of the alleged commission of the offense provided that the defendant should be tried by twelve jurors; that the alleged conviction was in violation of the provisions of the constitution of the United States guarantying due, process of law; and that the constitution and laws of Utah providing for trials in criminal cases, not capital, by a jury of eight persons, were, as to the offense committed prior to the admission of the state into the Union as a state, in violation of section 10 of article 1 of the constitution of the United States. The motion was overruled, and the defendant appealed to this court.

The questions involved in this appeal were fully passed upon by the court in the case of State v.Bates, 14 Utah 293. That case is decisive of this. We find no error in the record. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

ZaNE, C. J., and Baetch, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MiNER, J.:

The appellant, Thompson, was indicted for the crime of larceny in May, 1895. He was tried in Emery county in May, 1897, before a jury consisting of eight persons duly chosen and qualified; found guilty; and sentenced to imprisonment in the penitentiary. When called upon for sentence, his counsel moved to vacate and set aside the verdict, on the ground that the defendant had been tried before eight jurors, when the law in force at the time of the alleged commission of the offense provided that the defendant should be tried by twelve jurors; that the alleged conviction was in violation of the provisions of the constitution of the United States guarantying due, process of law; and that the constitution and laws of Utah providing for trials in criminal cases, not capital, by a jury of eight persons, were, as to the offense committed prior to the admission of the state into the Union as a state, in violation of section 10 of article 1 of the constitution of the United States. The motion was overruled, and the defendant appealed to this court.

The questions involved in this appeal were fully passed upon by the court in the case of State v.Bates, 14 Utah 293. That case is decisive of this. We find no error in the record. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

ZaNE, C. J., and Baetch, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 P. 409, 15 Utah 488, 1897 Utah LEXIS 70, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-thompson-utah-1897.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack