State v. Thompson

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

State v. Thompson

DecidedJuly 10, 2008

Docket2008-UP-353

StatusUnpublished

This text of State v. Thompson (State v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Thompson, (S.C. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Kevin Thompson, Appellant.

Appeal From Lexington County
William P. Keesley, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-353
Submitted July 1, 2008 Filed July 10, 2008

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Donald V. Myers, of Lexington, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Kevin Thompson appeals his guilty plea to possession with intent to distribute cocaine within the proximity of a school. On appeal, Thompson argues the trial judge erred by accepting the guilty plea when the State failed to introduce an official drug analysis. After a thorough review of the record and counsels brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Thompsons appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., CURETON and GOOLSBY, A.J.J., concur

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Kevin Thompson, Appellant.

Appeal From Lexington County
William P. Keesley, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-353
Submitted July 1, 2008 Filed July 10, 2008

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Donald V. Myers, of Lexington, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Kevin Thompson appeals his guilty plea to possession with intent to distribute cocaine within the proximity of a school. On appeal, Thompson argues the trial judge erred by accepting the guilty plea when the State failed to introduce an official drug analysis. After a thorough review of the record and counsels brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Thompsons appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., CURETON and GOOLSBY, A.J.J., concur

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

State v. Thompson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-thompson-scctapp-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack