State v. Thompson

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Thompson. Read the opinion of the Court — 352 S.C. 552
Court of Appeals of South Carolina·Decided February 18, 2004·No. 2004-UP-107·Unpublished

Opinion

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State,        Respondent,

v.

John Thompson,        Appellant.


Appeal From Horry County
James E. Lockemy, Circuit Court Judge


Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-107
Submitted December 23, 2003 – Filed February 18, 2004


APPEAL DISMISSED


Assistant Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson, of Columbia, and Solicitor John Gregory Hembree, of Conway, for Respondents.

PER CURIAM:  John Thompson was convicted of distribution of heroin, sentenced to eighteen-years imprisonment, and fined $50,000.  Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Thompson’s counsel attached a petition to be relieved as counsel.  Thompson filed a pro se response.

After review of the record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Fortune’s appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED. [1]

GOOLSBY, HOWARD, and KITTRIDGE, JJ., concurring.


[1] Because oral argument would not aid the Court in resolving any issue on appeal, we decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215 and 220(b)(2), SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Thompson, (S.C. Ct. App. 2004).

State v. Thompson (State v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
State v. Williams
406 S.E.2d 357 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1991)