State v. Thompson

920 P.2d 566, 142 Or. App. 222, 1996 Ore. App. LEXIS 1023
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Thompson. Read the opinion of the Court — 131 Or. App. 230
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided July 17, 1996·No. C94-08-35160; C94-10-36887; CA A87847 (Control); CA A88406·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals his convictions for burglary in the first degree, rape in the first degree, sexual abuse in the first degree and theft in the first and third degrees. We have considered and reject, without discussion, his contention that he was arrested without probable cause and that the trial court therefore erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained as a result of the allegedly unlawful arrest.

The state concedes, however, that the trial court’s imposition of terms of post-prison supervision of 250 months on rape in the first degree and 120 months on sexual abuse in the first degree exceed the maximum allowed by law. It also concedes that the court erred in ordering that defendant be sentenced pursuant to ORS 137.635 on his convictions for sexual abuse and theft. We agree and accept the concessions.

Convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Thompson, 920 P.2d 566, 142 Or. App. 222, 1996 Ore. App. LEXIS 1023 (Or. Ct. App. 1996).

920 P.2d 566 (State v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 137.635
Oregon § 137.635