State v. Thompson

843 P.2d 960, 117 Or. App. 168, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 2335
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided December 9, 1992·No. 89-08-0282 CR; CA A70456·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals from his conviction for theft in the first degree. ORS 164.055. We reverse.

Defendant was found guilty in a jury trial. Before sentencing, he learned that the grand jury that indicted him had only six members and moved to quash the indictment. The court denied the motion.

Seven grand jurors must hear and consider all the evidence presented before a grand jury can return a valid indictment. Or Const, Art VII (amended), § 5(2); Goodwin v. State of Oregon, 116 Or App 279, 840 P2d 1372 (1992). Here, only six grand jurors considered the evidence and returned the indictment against defendant. The indictment is void.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Thompson, 843 P.2d 960, 117 Or. App. 168, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 2335 (Or. Ct. App. 1992).

843 P.2d 960 (State v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Thompson
869 P.2d 361 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1994)