State v. Thompson
This text of 158 A.2d 333 (State v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment is reversed for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion filed by Judge Sullivan in the court below, and the judgment of conviction is affirmed.
Mr. Justice Hall and Mr. Justice Sohettino vote to affirm the judgment for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Eoley in the court below.
For reversal—Chief Justice Weintraub, and Justices Burling, Jacobs, Erancis and Proctor—5.
For affirmance—Justices Hall and Schettino—2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
158 A.2d 333, 31 N.J. 540, 1960 N.J. LEXIS 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-thompson-nj-1960.