State v. Thompson

158 A.2d 333, 31 N.J. 540, 1960 N.J. LEXIS 253
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 22, 1960·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment is reversed for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion filed by Judge Sullivan in the court below, and the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Hall and Mr. Justice Sohettino vote to affirm the judgment for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Eoley in the court below.

For reversal—Chief Justice Weintraub, and Justices Burling, Jacobs, Erancis and Proctor—5.

For affirmance—Justices Hall and Schettino—2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Thompson, 158 A.2d 333, 31 N.J. 540, 1960 N.J. LEXIS 253 (N.J. 1960).

158 A.2d 333 (State v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Thompson
191 F. Supp. 545 (D. New Jersey, 1961)