State v. Thompson

164 S.E.2d 391, 3 N.C. App. 231, 1968 N.C. App. LEXIS 835
Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided December 11, 1968·No. No. 6815SC456·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PARKER, J.

Appellant’s sole assignment of error is to the signing of the judgment. This presents the face of the record proper for review. 1 Strong, N. C. Index 2d, Appeal and Error, § 26, p. 162. Appellant’s brief admits that his pleas of guilty were freely and voluntarily entered. The sentences imposed were within statutory limits. G.S. 14-3. Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has frankly stated in his brief that he is unable to suggest any error in connection with the proceedings in this case. After careful review of the record, we agree, and find

No error.

Broce and Britt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Thompson, 164 S.E.2d 391, 3 N.C. App. 231, 1968 N.C. App. LEXIS 835 (N.C. Ct. App. 1968).

164 S.E.2d 391 (State v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Holden
168 S.E.2d 74 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1969)