State v. Thompson

105 S.W.3d 559, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 770, 2003 WL 21220025
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Thompson. Read the opinion of the Court — 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1580
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 27, 2003·No. No. WD 60711·Published

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

Dejuan L. Thompson appeals his convictions, after a jury trial in Jackson County, of robbery in the first degree, § 669.020, and armed criminal action, § 571.015. In his sole point on appeal, Mr. Thompson alleges the trial court plainly erred in limiting defense counsel’s opening statement to evidence that the defense would present in its case in chief because the State’s witnesses could have been deemed defense witnesses but for the fact that the State’s case proceeded first. Mr. Thompson argues it was fundamentally unfair to prohibit the defense from apprising the jury of the exculpatory evidence the defense would elicit from the State’s witnesses.

Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Thompson, 105 S.W.3d 559, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 770, 2003 WL 21220025 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003).

105 S.W.3d 559 (State v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.