State v. Thompson

50 S.W. 879, 149 Mo. 439, 1899 Mo. LEXIS 40
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided May 9, 1899·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

SHERWOOD, J.

Defendant was convicted of a felonious assault on Jeff Petty, by shooting at him with a pistol and his punishment assessed at a fine of $100, and imprisonment in the county jail for three months.

On the twenty-first of September, 1897, an appeal was granted defendant, and he given ninety days in which to file his bill of exceptions.

On the fourteenth of December next thereafter, the court extended the time for filing to January 15, 1898. The record then has this entry: “And afterwards, to wit, on the —-day of January, 1898, in vacation, the said defendant filed in said court, with the clerk thereof, his bill of exceptions in said cause, which said bill of exceptions had the following indorsement thereon: ‘Filed on the-day of January, 1898/ ”

From this entry it does not appear that the bill was filed within the time allowed by the order of the court. More than that, the supposed bill has not been signed by the judge and therefore can not be regarded. [Garth v. Caldwell, 72 Mo. 622, and cases cited.]

This being the case and there being no error in the record proper, judgment affirmed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Thompson, 50 S.W. 879, 149 Mo. 439, 1899 Mo. LEXIS 40 (Mo. 1899).

50 S.W. 879 (State v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Albert v. Van Frank
87 Mo. App. 511 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1901)