State v. Thompson

64 So. 3d 1281, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10904, 2011 WL 2698686
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 12, 2011·No. No. 1D10-1841·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Reversed and remanded for resentenc-ing. See State v. Thompson, 4 So.3d 689, 690 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) (“We agree with the State’s argument that imposition of the 20-year minimum mandatory sentence is required by law. Whether imposition of the 20-year mandatory term would be a ‘crime in itself,’ as stated by the trial court, is a matter directed to the legislature.” (footnote omitted)).

BENTON, C.J., DAVIS, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Thompson, 64 So. 3d 1281, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10904, 2011 WL 2698686 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

64 So. 3d 1281 (State v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Thompson
79 So. 3d 933 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)