State v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Thompson

12 A.3d 1004, 300 Conn. 905, 2011 Conn. LEXIS 35

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided February 1, 2011·No. SC 18740·Published

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 124 Conn. App. 353 (AC 30531), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the contested search was not unreasonably premature?

“2. If the search was unreasonable, did the Appellate Court properly determine that the defendant lacked standing to challenge the search of the host’s home and garage?”

EVELEIGH, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 124 Conn. App. 353 (AC 30531), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the contested search was not unreasonably premature?

“2. If the search was unreasonable, did the Appellate Court properly determine that the defendant lacked standing to challenge the search of the host’s home and garage?”

EVELEIGH, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

State v. Thompson, 12 A.3d 1004, 300 Conn. 905, 2011 Conn. LEXIS 35 (Colo. 2011).

Pincite

12 A.3d 1004 (State v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related