State v. Thompson

802 A.2d 90, 260 Conn. 936, 2002 Conn. LEXIS 262
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided June 18, 2002·No. SC 16784·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 69 Conn. App. 299 (AC 21588), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the prosecutor’s three improper remarks in rebuttal argument required reversal of the judgment of conviction?

“2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that: (a) the trial court improperly permitted one witness to testify as to the credibility of another; and (b) that ruling constituted harmful error?”

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Joy K. Fausey, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition. Moira L. Buckley, assistant public defender, in opposition. Decided June 18, 2002

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Thompson, 802 A.2d 90, 260 Conn. 936, 2002 Conn. LEXIS 262 (Colo. 2002).

802 A.2d 90 (State v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Thompson
832 A.2d 626 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2003)
State v. Ceballos
832 A.2d 14 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2003)