State v. Thompson
Opinion
The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 69 Conn. App. 299 (AC 21588), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the prosecutor’s three improper remarks in rebuttal argument required reversal of the judgment of conviction?
“2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that: (a) the trial court improperly permitted one witness to testify as to the credibility of another; and (b) that ruling constituted harmful error?”
VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
802 A.2d 90 (State v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.