State v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Thompson

802 A.2d 90, 260 Conn. 936, 2002 Conn. LEXIS 262

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedJune 18, 2002

DocketSC 16784

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 802 A.2d 90 (State v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Thompson, 802 A.2d 90, 260 Conn. 936, 2002 Conn. LEXIS 262 (Colo. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 69 Conn. App. 299 (AC 21588), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the prosecutor’s three improper remarks in rebuttal argument required reversal of the judgment of conviction?

“2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that: (a) the trial court improperly permitted one witness to testify as to the credibility of another; and (b) that ruling constituted harmful error?”

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Joy K. Fausey, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition. Moira L. Buckley, assistant public defender, in opposition. Decided June 18, 2002

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI