State v. Thompkins

662 N.E.2d 27, 75 Ohio St. 3d 1424
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 27, 1996
Docket95-2647
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 662 N.E.2d 27 (State v. Thompkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Thompkins, 662 N.E.2d 27, 75 Ohio St. 3d 1424 (Ohio 1996).

Opinion

Hamilton County, No. C-940513. On motions for discretionary appeal and cross-appeal. Discretionary appeal and cross-appeal allowed.

[1425]*1425Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent. Stratton, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
662 N.E.2d 27, 75 Ohio St. 3d 1424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-thompkins-ohio-1996.