State v. Thomas

Wisconsin Supreme Court

State v. Thomas

603 N.W.2d 84, 231 Wis. 2d 241, 1999 Wisc. LEXIS 340

CourtWisconsin Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 8, 1999

Docket98-0152

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 603 N.W.2d 84 (State v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Thomas, 603 N.W.2d 84, 231 Wis. 2d 241, 1999 Wisc. LEXIS 340 (Wis. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

¶ 1. The court is equally divided on the question of whether the unpublished decision of the court of appeals, State v. Thomas, no. *242 98-0152 (Dec. 9,1998), should be affirmed or reversed. Chief Justice SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, Justice WILLIAM A. BABLITCH and Justice ANN WALSH BRADLEY would affirm; Justice JON P. WILCOX, Justice N. PATRICK CROOKS and Justice DIANE S. SYKES would reverse. Justice DAVID T. PROSSER did not participate.

¶ 2. Accordingly, the decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

¶ 1. The court is equally divided on the question of whether the unpublished decision of the court of appeals, State v. Thomas, no. *242 98-0152 (Dec. 9,1998), should be affirmed or reversed. Chief Justice SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, Justice WILLIAM A. BABLITCH and Justice ANN WALSH BRADLEY would affirm; Justice JON P. WILCOX, Justice N. PATRICK CROOKS and Justice DIANE S. SYKES would reverse. Justice DAVID T. PROSSER did not participate.

¶ 2. Accordingly, the decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

603 N.W.2d 84, 231 Wis. 2d 241, 1999 Wisc. LEXIS 340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-thomas-wis-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack