State v. Thomas
This text of State v. Thomas (State v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Jerrick Miguel Thomas, Appellant.
Appeal From Aiken County
R. Ferrell Cothran, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-105
Submitted February 1, 2012 Filed
February 22, 2012
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Elizabeth A. Franklin-Best, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor J. Strom Thurmond, Jr., of Aiken, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Jerrick Miguel Thomas appeals his sentence for first-degree burglary, arguing the circuit court abused its discretion in sentencing him when it failed to consider whether it had the option to suspend his sentence. After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]
APPEAL DISMISSED.
FEW, C.J., HUFF and SHORT, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Thomas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-thomas-scctapp-2012.