State v. Thomas

418 P.2d 837, 244 Or. 377, 1966 Ore. LEXIS 637
Oregon Supreme Court·Decided September 28, 1966·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

LUSK, J.

The defendant has appealed from a judgment of conviction of the crime of being an exconvict in possession of a concealable firearm, to wit, a revolver.

[378] The only assignment of error is to the court’s denial of defendant’s motion for a directed verdict of acquittal, based on the ground that there was no proof that the revolver was capable of being fired. In State v. Cartwright, this day decided, a case involving the same charge, we held that a pistol in apparently good condition is presumptively operable. That decision rules this case.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Thomas, 418 P.2d 837, 244 Or. 377, 1966 Ore. LEXIS 637 (Or. 1966).

418 P.2d 837 (State v. Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Lee
237 N.W.2d 880 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1976)