State v. Thomas

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Thomas

567 S.W.3d 282

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 13, 2019

DocketNo. ED 105937

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 567 S.W.3d 282 (State v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Thomas, 567 S.W.3d 282 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Aaron Thomas appeals from the judgment entered on his convictions after a bench trial for one count of statutory rape and two counts of statutory sodomy. There was no error, plain or otherwise, in the admission of evidence. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Aaron Thomas appeals from the judgment entered on his convictions after a bench trial for one count of statutory rape and two counts of statutory sodomy. There was no error, plain or otherwise, in the admission of evidence. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

567 S.W.3d 282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-thomas-moctapp-2019.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack