State v. Thomas

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Thomas

567 S.W.3d 282

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 13, 2019·No. No. ED 105937·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Aaron Thomas appeals from the judgment entered on his convictions after a bench trial for one count of statutory rape and two counts of statutory sodomy. There was no error, plain or otherwise, in the admission of evidence. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Aaron Thomas appeals from the judgment entered on his convictions after a bench trial for one count of statutory rape and two counts of statutory sodomy. There was no error, plain or otherwise, in the admission of evidence. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Thomas, 567 S.W.3d 282 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

567 S.W.3d 282 (State v. Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related