State v. Thomas

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Thomas

70 S.W.3d 487, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 58, 2002 WL 46958

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 15, 2002

DocketNo. ED 79149

StatusPublished

This text of 70 S.W.3d 487 (State v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Thomas, 70 S.W.3d 487, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 58, 2002 WL 46958 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael Thomas (“defendant”) appeals the judgment following his conviction by a jury of assault of a law enforcement officer in the first degree, in violation of section 565.081 RSMo 2000, and armed criminal action, in violation of section 571.015. The trial court entered judgment on the verdict and sentenced defendant to two concurrent twenty-year terms of imprisonment.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael Thomas (“defendant”) appeals the judgment following his conviction by a jury of assault of a law enforcement officer in the first degree, in violation of section 565.081 RSMo 2000, and armed criminal action, in violation of section 571.015. The trial court entered judgment on the verdict and sentenced defendant to two concurrent twenty-year terms of imprisonment.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

70 S.W.3d 487, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 58, 2002 WL 46958, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-thomas-moctapp-2002.