State v. Thomas

991 S.W.2d 191, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 624
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 11, 1999·No. No. 74308·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kembert Thomas (Defendant) appeals from the judgments entered following his jury convictions of second degree murder and armed criminal action in violation of sections 565.021 and 571.015, RSMo 1994.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. Further, there is sufficient evidence from which a reasonable juror might have found Defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. Grim, 854 S.W.2d 403 (Mo. banc 1993). An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Thomas, 991 S.W.2d 191, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 624 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999).

991 S.W.2d 191 (State v. Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas v. State
31 S.W.3d 23 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2000)