State v. Thomas

862 S.W.2d 925, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1476, 1993 WL 360829
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Thomas. Read the opinion of the Court — 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1552
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 21, 1993·No. Nos. 61310, 62972 and 63050·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction for first degree assault, § 565.050, RSMo 1986, and [926]*926armed criminal action § 571.015, RSMo 1986. He also appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. The trial court sentenced defendant as a prior, persistent and class X offender to twenty-two years imprisonment for first degree assault and twenty-two years imprisonment for armed criminal action. The sentences were to run concurrently. We affirm.

We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 80.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Thomas, 862 S.W.2d 925, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1476, 1993 WL 360829 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

862 S.W.2d 925 (State v. Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.