State v. Thomas
This text of 488 A.2d 939 (State v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.
Peter B. Thomas attempts to appeal prior to trial on his indictment for reckless conduct with a firearm, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 211 (1983), from an order of the Superior Court, Cumberland County, impounding certain tapes and transcripts of Thomas’s grand jury testimony made secretly by Thomas. We determine that no exception to the final judgment rule permits immediate appeal from such an interlocutory order. See State v. Baillargeon, 297 A.2d 896, 897 (Me.1972). See also State v. Bassford, 440 A.2d 1059, 1061 (Me.1982) and State v. LeClair, 304 A.2d 385, 386 (Me.1973) (discussing report of cases pursuant to M.R. Crim.P. 37A(b) as an exception to the final judgment rule).
The entry is:
Appeal dismissed.
All concurring.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
488 A.2d 939, 1985 Me. LEXIS 896, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-thomas-me-1985.