State v. Thomas

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Thomas

483 So. 2d 1012, 1986 La. LEXIS 5847

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMarch 7, 1986

DocketNo. 86-KK-0401

StatusPublished

This text of 483 So. 2d 1012 (State v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Thomas, 483 So. 2d 1012, 1986 La. LEXIS 5847 (La. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Eurl Thomas, Jr., applying for writs of certiorati/review, remedial writs and stay order, 19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 6-85-308, First Circuit, Court of Appeal, Nos. KW-86-0132, KW-86-0175.

The writ is denied in part and granted in part. The hearsay statement made by the victim to the victim’s son is not admissible and should be excluded. The writ is otherwise denied.

WATSON, J., would deny the writ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Eurl Thomas, Jr., applying for writs of certiorati/review, remedial writs and stay order, 19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 6-85-308, First Circuit, Court of Appeal, Nos. KW-86-0132, KW-86-0175.

The writ is denied in part and granted in part. The hearsay statement made by the victim to the victim’s son is not admissible and should be excluded. The writ is otherwise denied.

WATSON, J., would deny the writ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

483 So. 2d 1012, 1986 La. LEXIS 5847, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-thomas-la-1986.