State v. Thomas

954 So. 2d 1253, 2007 WL 1201757
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Thomas. Read the opinion of the Court — 960 So. 2d 869
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 25, 2007·No. 3D06-1689·Published

Opinion

954 So.2d 1253 (2007)

The STATE of Florida, Appellant,
v.
Anthony THOMAS, Appellee.

No. 3D06-1689.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 25, 2007.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Laura Moszer, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Harvey J. Sepler, Assistant Public Defender, for appellee.

Before GERSTEN, RAMIREZ, and WELLS, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The trial court erred by imposing a downward departure sentence upon the defendant, over the State's objection, without providing a written statement delineating the reasons for the departure. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(11); State v. Sherman, 909 So.2d 963 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); State v. Jones, 579 So.2d 884 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); State v. Brown, 542 So.2d 1371 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Thomas, 954 So. 2d 1253, 2007 WL 1201757 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

954 So. 2d 1253 (State v. Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Brown
542 So. 2d 1371 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
State v. Sherman
909 So. 2d 963 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
State v. Jones
579 So. 2d 884 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)