State v. Thomas

722 A.2d 1217, 247 Conn. 935, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 423
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedNovember 3, 1998
DocketSC 16040
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 722 A.2d 1217 (State v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Thomas, 722 A.2d 1217, 247 Conn. 935, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 423 (Colo. 1998).

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 50 Conn. App. 369 (AC 15740), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly terminate its review of the defendant’s Batson claim after concluding that some of the state’s reasons for exercising its peremptory challenge against an African-American venireperson were legitimate?”

KATZ, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Susan M. Hankins, assistant public defender, in support of the petition. Ellen A. Jawitz, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided November 3, 1998

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Thomas
755 A.2d 179 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
722 A.2d 1217, 247 Conn. 935, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 423, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-thomas-conn-1998.