State v. Thinh Thien Pham

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Thinh Thien Pham

595 So. 2d 85, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 676, 1992 WL 10886

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 17, 1992

DocketNos. 91-2, 91-3

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 595 So. 2d 85 (State v. Thinh Thien Pham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Thinh Thien Pham, 595 So. 2d 85, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 676, 1992 WL 10886 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinions

JOANOS, Chief Judge.

The state appeals from an order dismissing the information filed against appellees Thinh Thien Pham and Hang Thi Vu. The issue in this case is identical to the issue decided in State v. Munoz, 586 So.2d 515 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), that is, whether enactment of section 777.201, Florida Statutes (1987), evinces legislative intent to overrule Cruz v. State, 465 So.2d 516 (Fla.1985), cert. denied, 473 U.S. 905, 105 S.Ct. 3527, 87 L.Ed.2d 652 (1985), and establish a new law of entrapment. We reverse the order of the trial court for the reasons referenced in Munoz v. State. See Krajewski v. State, 587 So.2d 1175 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), quashed on other grounds, 589 So.2d 254 (Fla.1991); Gonzalez v. State, 571 So.2d 1346 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990), review denied, 584 So.2d 998 (Fla.1991).

ERVIN, J., and WENTWORTH, Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JOANOS, Chief Judge.

The state appeals from an order dismissing the information filed against appellees Thinh Thien Pham and Hang Thi Vu. The issue in this case is identical to the issue decided in State v. Munoz, 586 So.2d 515 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), that is, whether enactment of section 777.201, Florida Statutes (1987), evinces legislative intent to overrule Cruz v. State, 465 So.2d 516 (Fla.1985), cert. denied, 473 U.S. 905, 105 S.Ct. 3527, 87 L.Ed.2d 652 (1985), and establish a new law of entrapment. We reverse the order of the trial court for the reasons referenced in Munoz v. State. See Krajewski v. State, 587 So.2d 1175 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), quashed on other grounds, 589 So.2d 254 (Fla.1991); Gonzalez v. State, 571 So.2d 1346 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990), review denied, 584 So.2d 998 (Fla.1991).

ERVIN, J., and WENTWORTH, Senior Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

595 So. 2d 85, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 676, 1992 WL 10886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-thinh-thien-pham-fladistctapp-1992.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack