State v. Thigpen

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Thigpen

575 S.W.3d 508

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Thigpen. Read the opinion of the Court — 548 S.W.3d 302 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 21, 2019·No. No. ED 106602·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Victor Thigpen appeals the judgment entered on a jury verdict convicting him of five counts of first-degree statutory sodomy and one count of first-degree statutory rape. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Victor Thigpen appeals the judgment entered on a jury verdict convicting him of five counts of first-degree statutory sodomy and one count of first-degree statutory rape. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Thigpen, 575 S.W.3d 508 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

575 S.W.3d 508 (State v. Thigpen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.