State v. Thigpen

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Thigpen

575 S.W.3d 508

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 21, 2019

DocketNo. ED 106602

StatusPublished

This text of 575 S.W.3d 508 (State v. Thigpen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Thigpen, 575 S.W.3d 508 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Victor Thigpen appeals the judgment entered on a jury verdict convicting him of five counts of first-degree statutory sodomy and one count of first-degree statutory rape. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Victor Thigpen appeals the judgment entered on a jury verdict convicting him of five counts of first-degree statutory sodomy and one count of first-degree statutory rape. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

575 S.W.3d 508, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-thigpen-moctapp-2019.