State v. Thiede

Connecticut Superior Court

State v. Thiede

4 Conn. Super. Ct. 438, 4 Conn. Supp. 438, 1937 Conn. Super. LEXIS 21

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedFebruary 16, 1937

DocketFile #13613

StatusPublished

This text of 4 Conn. Super. Ct. 438 (State v. Thiede) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Thiede, 4 Conn. Super. Ct. 438, 4 Conn. Supp. 438, 1937 Conn. Super. LEXIS 21 (Colo. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

JENNINGS, J.

This case will have been of great value if it calls attention to the existence of Cumulative Supplement 1628c. By the provisions of this statute the practice of law *439 by others than duly admitted attorneys is forbidden. The drafting of wills has, from time immemorial, been considered an important branch of the practice of law. Since the accused drafted a will, and since he is not an attorney, he has done well to plead guilty. The situation is as simple as that. There is much complaint from lawyers and others that legal advice is being given and legal instruments drafted by those lacking that training required of lawyers. The answer to such complaints is to enforce the statute. Precedent is hardly required. In order to preserve the more important references in the State’s elaborate brief, they are recited here. The Yale Law Journal article is particularly valuable.

41 Yale Law Journal, 70.

Unauthorized Practice of Law, Hicks & Katz, 1934.

People vs. People’s Stock Yards State Bank, 176 N. E. 901; 344 Ill. 462 (1931).

In re Duncan, 83 S. C. 186; 65 S. E. 210; 2 R. C. L. 938.

In re Opinion of Justices, 194 N. E. 313; 289 Mass. 607.

Land Title Abstract & Trust Co. vs. Dworken, 129 O. St. 23; 193 N. E. 650.

Seawell vs. Carolina Motor Club, 209 N. C. 624; 184 S. E. 540 (1936).

The accused is fined $25.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JENNINGS, J.

This case will have been of great value if it calls attention to the existence of Cumulative Supplement 1628c. By the provisions of this statute the practice of law *439 by others than duly admitted attorneys is forbidden. The drafting of wills has, from time immemorial, been considered an important branch of the practice of law. Since the accused drafted a will, and since he is not an attorney, he has done well to plead guilty. The situation is as simple as that. There is much complaint from lawyers and others that legal advice is being given and legal instruments drafted by those lacking that training required of lawyers. The answer to such complaints is to enforce the statute. Precedent is hardly required. In order to preserve the more important references in the State’s elaborate brief, they are recited here. The Yale Law Journal article is particularly valuable.

41 Yale Law Journal, 70.

Unauthorized Practice of Law, Hicks & Katz, 1934.

People vs. People’s Stock Yards State Bank, 176 N. E. 901; 344 Ill. 462 (1931).

In re Duncan, 83 S. C. 186; 65 S. E. 210; 2 R. C. L. 938.

In re Opinion of Justices, 194 N. E. 313; 289 Mass. 607.

Land Title Abstract & Trust Co. vs. Dworken, 129 O. St. 23; 193 N. E. 650.

Seawell vs. Carolina Motor Club, 209 N. C. 624; 184 S. E. 540 (1936).

The accused is fined $25.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Conn. Super. Ct. 438, 4 Conn. Supp. 438, 1937 Conn. Super. LEXIS 21, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-thiede-connsuperct-1937.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack