State v. Theoferlius D.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Theoferlius D.

895 A.2d 793, 277 Conn. 916, 2006 Conn. LEXIS 79

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided March 2, 2006·No. SC 17616·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 93 Conn. App. 88 (AC 25530), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly decline to dismiss the defendant’s appeal from his revocation of probation and ensuing incarceration as moot?”

Michele C. Lukban, senior assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition. Martha Brooke Hansen, special public defender, in opposition. Decided March 2, 2006

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 93 Conn. App. 88 (AC 25530), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly decline to dismiss the defendant’s appeal from his revocation of probation and ensuing incarceration as moot?”

Michele C. Lukban, senior assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition. Martha Brooke Hansen, special public defender, in opposition. Decided March 2, 2006

State v. Theoferlius D., 895 A.2d 793, 277 Conn. 916, 2006 Conn. LEXIS 79 (Colo. 2006).

Pincite

895 A.2d 793 (State v. Theoferlius D.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related