Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/State v. Theoferlius D.

State v. Theoferlius D.

895 A.2d 793, 277 Conn. 916, 2006 Conn. LEXIS 79
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedMarch 2, 2006
DocketSC 17616
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 895 A.2d 793 (State v. Theoferlius D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Theoferlius D., 895 A.2d 793, 277 Conn. 916, 2006 Conn. LEXIS 79 (Colo. 2006).

Opinion

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 93 Conn. App. 88 (AC 25530), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly decline to dismiss the defendant’s appeal from his revocation of probation and ensuing incarceration as moot?”

Michele C. Lukban, senior assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition. Martha Brooke Hansen, special public defender, in opposition. Decided March 2, 2006

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. T.D.
286 Conn. 353 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
895 A.2d 793, 277 Conn. 916, 2006 Conn. LEXIS 79, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-theoferlius-d-conn-2006.