State v. Tharp

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Tharp

266 So. 2d 914, 263 La. 20, 1972 La. LEXIS 5327

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedOctober 4, 1972

DocketNo. 52848

StatusPublished

This text of 266 So. 2d 914 (State v. Tharp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Tharp, 266 So. 2d 914, 263 La. 20, 1972 La. LEXIS 5327 (La. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

This Court will not interfere with the orderly trial of - a criminal case except where irreparable injury is shown. No such showing having been made, the application is denied.

McCALEB, C. J., and SANDERS, J:,"

although of the ' opinion that the judge erred in curtailing' the district attorney’s cross-examination . of the defense witness on a matter pertaining to the veracity of her. testimony- concerning the affirmative defense of -entrapment, nevertheless • con- . [22]*22cur in the denial of the application as it has long been the policy of this Court not to interfere with the orderly progress of a criminal trial on questions pertaining to the admission or rejection of evidence, save in cases where a motion to suppress has been erroneously sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This Court will not interfere with the orderly trial of - a criminal case except where irreparable injury is shown. No such showing having been made, the application is denied.

McCALEB, C. J., and SANDERS, J:,"

although of the ' opinion that the judge erred in curtailing' the district attorney’s cross-examination . of the defense witness on a matter pertaining to the veracity of her. testimony- concerning the affirmative defense of -entrapment, nevertheless • con- . [22]*22cur in the denial of the application as it has long been the policy of this Court not to interfere with the orderly progress of a criminal trial on questions pertaining to the admission or rejection of evidence, save in cases where a motion to suppress has been erroneously sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

266 So. 2d 914, 263 La. 20, 1972 La. LEXIS 5327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-tharp-la-1972.