State v. Thames

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Thames

829 S.W.2d 100, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 710, 1992 WL 86407

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 28, 1992·No. No. 59964·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury of three counts of second degree robbery in violation of § 569.030 RSMo 1986.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury of three counts of second degree robbery in violation of § 569.030 RSMo 1986.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Thames, 829 S.W.2d 100, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 710, 1992 WL 86407 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

829 S.W.2d 100 (State v. Thames) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.