State v. Terry

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Terry

475 S.W.3d 176, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 902, 2015 WL 5227936

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 8, 2015·No. WD 77596·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

David Terry appeals his conviction for the class D felony of . sexual misconduct involving a child in violation of section 566.083. He claims that the evidence was insufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he knowingly exposed his genitals to the victim. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule .30.25(b). .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

David Terry appeals his conviction for the class D felony of . sexual misconduct involving a child in violation of section 566.083. He claims that the evidence was insufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he knowingly exposed his genitals to the victim. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule .30.25(b). .

State v. Terry, 475 S.W.3d 176, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 902, 2015 WL 5227936 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

475 S.W.3d 176 (State v. Terry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.