State v. Terry

Supreme Court of Arkansas

State v. Terry

7 Ark. 133

Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided July 15, 1851·Published

Opinion

Mr. Justice Walker

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The Circuit Court correctly sustained the demurer to the plaintiff’s replication. The legal effect of payment is not to take the case out of the limitation act of 1839, and place it within the act of 1844. Biscoe and others v. Stone et al., 6 Eng. 39. Durritt v. Trammell, id. 183.

Let the judgment of the Circuit Court be, in all things, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Walker

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The Circuit Court correctly sustained the demurer to the plaintiff’s replication. The legal effect of payment is not to take the case out of the limitation act of 1839, and place it within the act of 1844. Biscoe and others v. Stone et al., 6 Eng. 39. Durritt v. Trammell, id. 183.

Let the judgment of the Circuit Court be, in all things, affirmed.

State v. Terry, 7 Ark. 133 (Ark. 1851).

Pincite

7 Ark. 133 (State v. Terry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.