State v. Terrell
This text of 402 A.2d 483 (State v. Terrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.
Defendant Ralph Edward Terrell was convicted of gross sexual misconduct in violation of 17-A M.R.S.A. § 253 (Supp.1978). On appeal, defendant argues and the State concedes that the State failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant committed the requisite “sexual act” as defined by 17-A M.R.S.A. § 251(1)(C). We agree. The defendant’s conviction based on the indictment for gross sexual misconduct cannot stand.
Although the evidence may have been sufficient to prove a “sexual contact” as defined by 17-A M.R.S.A. § 251(1)(D), thus establishing the offense of unlawful sexual contact in violation of 17-A M.R.S.A. § 255, the latter crime is not a lesser included offense of gross sexual misconduct. 17 — A M.R.S.A. § 251 defines “sexual contact” and “sexual act” to be mutually exclusive. We therefore must direct the entry of judgment of acquittal on the present indictment.
The entry is:
Appeal sustained.
Judgment of conviction reversed.
Remanded for entry of judgment of acquittal.
DUFRESNE, A. R. J., sat by assignment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
402 A.2d 483, 1979 Me. LEXIS 581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-terrell-me-1979.