State v. Teran

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Teran

502 S.W.3d 76, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1050, 2016 WL 6212058

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 25, 2016·No. No. ED103451·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Italo R. Pacheco Teran was convicted after a jury trial of first-degree burglary, two counts of felonious restraint, first-degree rape, three counts of first-degree sodomy, and abuse or neglect of a child. He appeals his conviction on Count VII, the class B felony of abuse or neglect of a child, arguing there was insufficient evidence to convict him of this offense. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Italo R. Pacheco Teran was convicted after a jury trial of first-degree burglary, two counts of felonious restraint, first-degree rape, three counts of first-degree sodomy, and abuse or neglect of a child. He appeals his conviction on Count VII, the class B felony of abuse or neglect of a child, arguing there was insufficient evidence to convict him of this offense. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

State v. Teran, 502 S.W.3d 76, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1050, 2016 WL 6212058 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

502 S.W.3d 76 (State v. Teran) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.