State v. Teigen

114 P.3d 539, 200 Or. App. 387, 2005 Ore. App. LEXIS 770
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided June 22, 2005·No. 030955; A122877·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant pleaded guilty to felony assault in the fourth degree. The trial court imposed a departure sentence based on a finding of persistent involvement in similar offenses. On appeal, defendant argues that the sentence is unlawful because it is based on facts not admitted or found by a jury, in violation of Blakely v. Washington, 542 US 296, 124 S Ct 2531, 159 L Ed 2d 403 (2004). The state concedes that, in light of our decision in State v. Perez, 196 Or App 364, 102 P3d 705 (2004), rev allowed, 338 Or 488 (2005), defendant is correct. We accept the concession.

Sentence vacated; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Teigen, 114 P.3d 539, 200 Or. App. 387, 2005 Ore. App. LEXIS 770 (Or. Ct. App. 2005).

114 P.3d 539 (State v. Teigen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Blakely v. Washington
542 U.S. 296 (Supreme Court, 2004)
State v. Perez
102 P.3d 705 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2004)