State v. Teeter
This text of 358 S.E.2d 66 (State v. Teeter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Harold TEETER.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Cahoon & Swisher, Greensboro, for defendant.
Charles H. Hobgood, Asst. Atty. Gen., Raleigh, for the State.
*67 ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant for Writ of Supersedeas and Temporary Stay of the execution of judgment of the Court of Appeals in this matter, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th day of July 1987."
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
358 S.E.2d 66, 320 N.C. 175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-teeter-nc-1987.